linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Microchip PolarFire Soc Support

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:33:39 -0700
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com,
        Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
        Ivan.Griffin@...rochip.com, Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Microchip PolarFire Soc Support

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 8:26 PM Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:17 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:02:48 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
> > > This series adds minimal support for Microchip Polar Fire Soc Icicle kit.
> > > It is rebased on v5.12-rc1 and depends on clock support.
> > > Only MMC and ethernet drivers are enabled via this series.
> > > The idea here is to add the foundational patches so that other drivers
> > > can be added to on top of this. The device tree may change based on
> > > feedback on bindings of individual driver support patches.
> > >
> > > This series has been tested on Qemu and Polar Fire Soc Icicle kit.
> > > It depends on the updated clock-series[2] and macb fix[3].
> > > The series is also tested by Lewis from Microchip.
> > >
> > > The series can also be found at.
> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/polarfire_support_upstream_v4
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg08582.html
> > > [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-clk/msg54579.html
> > >
> > > Changes from v3->v4:
> > > 1. Fixed few DT specific issues.
> > > 2. Rebased on top of new clock driver.
> > > 3. SD card functionality is verified.
> > >
> > > Changes from v2->v3:
> > > 1. Fixed a typo in dt binding.
> > > 2. Included MAINTAINERS entry for PolarFire SoC.
> > > 3. Improved the dts file by using lowercase clock names and keeping phy
> > >    details in board specific dts file.
> > >
> > > Changes from v1->v2:
> > > 1. Modified the DT to match the device tree in U-Boot.
> > > 2. Added both eMMC & SDcard entries in DT. However, SD card is only enabled
> > >    as it allows larger storage option for linux distros.
> > >
> > > Atish Patra (4):
> > > RISC-V: Add Microchip PolarFire SoC kconfig option
> > > dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: Add YAML documentation for the
> > > PolarFire SoC
> > > RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board
> > > RISC-V: Enable Microchip PolarFire ICICLE SoC
> > >
> > > Conor Dooley (1):
> > > MAINTAINERS: add microchip polarfire soc support
> > >
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml  |  27 ++
> > > MAINTAINERS                                   |   8 +
> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs                       |   7 +
> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile                  |   1 +
> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile        |   2 +
> > > .../microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts   |  72 ++++
> > > .../boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi    | 329 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/configs/defconfig                  |   4 +
> > > 8 files changed, 450 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
> >
> > I had this left in my inbox waiting for either some reviews to come in or a v2,
> > but I don't see any.  Did I miss something?
> >
> Sorry for the late reply. I am on vacation until May. I think I saw
> all the patches have already been reviewed.
> Let me know if it is not the case.
>
I cross checked and all the patches are reviewed-by.
@palmer: Is it possible to take this series for 5.13 MW ?

> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Atish


-- 
Regards,
Atish

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives