Message-ID: <mhng-8a0f200a-fc9e-4e6b-a881-433a024e8b69@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     atishp@...shpatra.org
CC:     Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>, bjorn@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com,
        Ivan.Griffin@...rochip.com, Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Microchip PolarFire Soc Support

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:33:39 PDT (-0700), atishp@...shpatra.org wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 8:26 PM Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:17 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:02:48 PST (-0800), Atish Patra wrote:
>> > > This series adds minimal support for Microchip Polar Fire Soc Icicle kit.
>> > > It is rebased on v5.12-rc1 and depends on clock support.
>> > > Only MMC and ethernet drivers are enabled via this series.
>> > > The idea here is to add the foundational patches so that other drivers
>> > > can be added to on top of this. The device tree may change based on
>> > > feedback on bindings of individual driver support patches.
>> > >
>> > > This series has been tested on Qemu and Polar Fire Soc Icicle kit.
>> > > It depends on the updated clock-series[2] and macb fix[3].
>> > > The series is also tested by Lewis from Microchip.
>> > >
>> > > The series can also be found at.
>> > > https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/polarfire_support_upstream_v4
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg08582.html
>> > > [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-clk/msg54579.html
>> > >
>> > > Changes from v3->v4:
>> > > 1. Fixed few DT specific issues.
>> > > 2. Rebased on top of new clock driver.
>> > > 3. SD card functionality is verified.
>> > >
>> > > Changes from v2->v3:
>> > > 1. Fixed a typo in dt binding.
>> > > 2. Included MAINTAINERS entry for PolarFire SoC.
>> > > 3. Improved the dts file by using lowercase clock names and keeping phy
>> > >    details in board specific dts file.
>> > >
>> > > Changes from v1->v2:
>> > > 1. Modified the DT to match the device tree in U-Boot.
>> > > 2. Added both eMMC & SDcard entries in DT. However, SD card is only enabled
>> > >    as it allows larger storage option for linux distros.
>> > >
>> > > Atish Patra (4):
>> > > RISC-V: Add Microchip PolarFire SoC kconfig option
>> > > dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: Add YAML documentation for the
>> > > PolarFire SoC
>> > > RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board
>> > > RISC-V: Enable Microchip PolarFire ICICLE SoC
>> > >
>> > > Conor Dooley (1):
>> > > MAINTAINERS: add microchip polarfire soc support
>> > >
>> > > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml  |  27 ++
>> > > MAINTAINERS                                   |   8 +
>> > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs                       |   7 +
>> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile                  |   1 +
>> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile        |   2 +
>> > > .../microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts   |  72 ++++
>> > > .../boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi    | 329 ++++++++++++++++++
>> > > arch/riscv/configs/defconfig                  |   4 +
>> > > 8 files changed, 450 insertions(+)
>> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/microchip.yaml
>> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
>> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dts
>> > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi
>> >
>> > I had this left in my inbox waiting for either some reviews to come in or a v2,
>> > but I don't see any.  Did I miss something?
>> >
>> Sorry for the late reply. I am on vacation until May. I think I saw
>> all the patches have already been reviewed.
>> Let me know if it is not the case.
>>
> I cross checked and all the patches are reviewed-by.
> @palmer: Is it possible to take this series for 5.13 MW ?

I still don't see any reviews for the mailbox driver, did it just get 
lost on the way to me?

>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > linux-riscv mailing list
>> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Atish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists