[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1j1nrx0.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:47:55 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v3: Do not enable irqs when handling spurious interrups
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:50:51 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
[...]
> > Fixes: 17ce302f3117 ("arm64: Fix interrupt tracing in the presence of NMIs")
> > Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>
>
> I'm reckon the fixes tag should probably be either:
>
> Fixes: f32c926651dcd168 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Handle pseudo-NMIs")
>
> ... or:
>
> Fixes: 3f1f3234bc2db1c1 (" irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking before calling IRQ handler")
>
> ... since the underlying issue is that gic_handle_irq() unmasks DAIF.I
> and permits unintended nesting, even if that doesn't trigger a BUG() at
> that point.
I used the latter (see 161917211934.29796.1841651233234902273.tip-bot2@...-bot2).
> Otherwise, this makes sense to me:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
I'll update the commit to reflect this.
Thanks.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists