lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YILjWpxy9R3rj6R8@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:10:18 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.11 000/122] 5.11.16-rc1 review

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:56:16AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 18:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.16 release.
> > There are 122 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.11.16-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.11.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.11.16-rc1
> * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> * git branch: linux-5.11.y
> * git commit: f34f787f0e47983f4f18c818b2cf23f5e3bf576e
> * git describe: v5.11.15-123-gf34f787f0e47
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.11.y/build/v5.11.15-123-gf34f787f0e47
> 
> ## No regressions (compared to v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f)
> 
> ## No fixes (compared to v5.11.14-24-g7825299a896f)
> 
> ## Test result summary
>  total: 76776, pass: 63385, fail: 2827, skip: 10320, xfail: 244,
> 
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 192 total, 192 passed, 0 failed
> * arm64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
> * dragonboard-410c: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
> * hi6220-hikey: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
> * juno-r2: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
> * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
> * parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
> * riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
> * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
> * sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
> * sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
> * x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed
> * x86: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
> 
> ## Test suites summary
> * fwts
> * igt-gpu-tools
> * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> * kselftest-
> * kselftest-android
> * kselftest-bpf
> * kselftest-capabilities
> * kselftest-cgroup
> * kselftest-clone3
> * kselftest-core
> * kselftest-cpu-hotplug
> * kselftest-cpufreq
> * kselftest-efivarfs
> * kselftest-filesystems
> * kselftest-firmware
> * kselftest-fpu
> * kselftest-futex
> * kselftest-gpio
> * kselftest-intel_pstate
> * kselftest-ipc
> * kselftest-ir
> * kselftest-kcmp
> * kselftest-kexec
> * kselftest-kvm
> * kselftest-lib
> * kselftest-livepatch
> * kselftest-lkdtm
> * kselftest-membarrier
> * kselftest-memfd
> * kselftest-memory-hotplug
> * kselftest-mincore
> * kselftest-mount
> * kselftest-mqueue
> * kselftest-net
> * kselftest-netfilter
> * kselftest-nsfs
> * kselftest-openat2
> * kselftest-pid_namespace
> * kselftest-pidfd
> * kselftest-proc
> * kselftest-pstore
> * kselftest-ptrace
> * kselftest-rseq
> * kselftest-rtc
> * kselftest-seccomp
> * kselftest-sigaltstack
> * kselftest-size
> * kselftest-splice
> * kselftest-static_keys
> * kselftest-sync
> * kselftest-sysctl
> * kselftest-tc-testing
> * kselftest-timens
> * kselftest-timers
> * kselftest-tmpfs
> * kselftest-tpm2
> * kselftest-user
> * kselftest-vm
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none-
> * kselftest-x86
> * kselftest-zram
> * kunit
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * libhugetlbfs
> * linux-log-parser
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-commands-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-controllers-tests
> * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> * ltp-crypto-tests
> * ltp-cve-tests
> * ltp-dio-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-mm-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-open-posix-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-tracing-tests
> * network-basic-tests
> * perf
> * rcutorture
> * ssuite
> * v4l2-compliance
> 
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ