[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YILjXk4lXavneW7H@alley>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:10:22 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf.c: remove leftover 'f' and 'F' cases from
bstr_printf()
On Fri 2021-04-23 11:45:29, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Commit 9af7706492f9 ("lib/vsprintf: Remove support for %pF and %pf in
> favour of %pS and %ps") removed support for %pF and %pf, and correctly
> removed the handling of those cases in vbin_printf(). However, the
> corresponding cases in bstr_printf() were left behind.
>
> In the same series, %pf was re-purposed for dealing with
> fwnodes (3bd32d6a2ee6, "lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier
> for printing fwnode names").
>
> So should anyone use %pf with the binary printf routines,
> vbin_printf() would (correctly, as it involves dereferencing the
> pointer) do the string formatting to the u32 array, but bstr_printf()
> would not copy the string from the u32 array, but instead interpret
> the first sizeof(void*) bytes of the formatted string as a pointer -
> which generally won't end well (also, all subsequent get_args would be
> out of sync).
>
> Fixes: 9af7706492f9 ("lib/vsprintf: Remove support for %pF and %pf in favour of %pS and %ps")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Great catch!
The patch is pushed in printk/linux.git, branch for-5.13 now.
I did it quickly because the merge window will likely be opened
next week and this should get in.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists