linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Apr 2021 17:10:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Patrick Mccormick <pmccormick@...italocean.com>
Cc:     Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:16:19PM -0700, Patrick Mccormick wrote:
> We ran tests on this kernel:
> 
> commit 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 (HEAD -> rc/linux-5.10.y)
> Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Date:   Thu Apr 15 16:44:09 2021 +0200
> 
>     Linux 5.10.31-rc1
> 
> No problems found.
> 
> Hardware tested on:
> 
> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz
> 
> Specific tests ran:
> 
> ok 1 ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl
> ok 2 ltp.py:LTP.test_math
> ok 3 ltp.py:LTP.test_dio
> ok 4 ltp.py:LTP.test_io
> ok 5 ltp.py:LTP.test_power_management_tests
> ok 6 ltp.py:LTP.test_can
> ok 7 ltp.py:LTP.test_input
> ok 8 ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb
> ok 9 ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc
> ok 10 ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent
> ok 11 ltp.py:LTP.test_smoketest
> ok 12 ltp.py:LTP.test_containers
> ok 13 ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps
> ok 14 ltp.py:LTP.test_sched
> ok 15 ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading
> ok 16 ltp.py:LTP.test_cap_bounds
> ok 17 kpatch.sh
> ok 18 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help
> ok 19 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version
> ok 20 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list
> ok 21 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record
> ok 22 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms
> ok 23 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate
> ok 24 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist
> ok 25 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script
> ok 26 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat
> ok 27 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench
> ok 28 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl
> ok 29 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size
> ok 30 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync
> ok 31 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities
> ok 32 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86
> ok 33 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd
> ok 34 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier
> ok 35 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack
> ok 36 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs
> ok 37 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user
> ok 38 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched
> ok 39 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens
> ok 40 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers
> 
> Tested-By: Patrick McCormick <pmccormick@...italocean.com>

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h