lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210426031711epcms2p2b64c07ab98332429204dac7ba920abf2@epcms2p2>
Date:   Mon, 26 Apr 2021 12:17:11 +0900
From:   Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To:     "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "ziqichen@...eaurora.org" <ziqichen@...eaurora.org>,
        "nguyenb@...eaurora.org" <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
        "hongwus@...eaurora.org" <hongwus@...eaurora.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
CC:     ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Cancel rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work
 during system suspend

Hi Can Guo,

>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>index 7ab6b12..090b654 100644
>--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>@@ -9058,11 +9058,12 @@ int ufshcd_system_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>         if (!hba->is_powered)
>                 return 0;
> 
>+        cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hba->rpm_dev_flush_recheck_work);
>+
>         if ((ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(hba->spm_lvl) ==
>              hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) &&
>             (ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_link_pwr_state(hba->spm_lvl) ==
>-             hba->uic_link_state) &&
>-             !hba->dev_info.b_rpm_dev_flush_capable)
I think it should not be removed.
It prevents power drain when runtime suspend and system suspend have same
power mode.

Thanks,
Daejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ