lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210426150127.GB23119@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:01:27 +0800
From:   Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        john.stultz@...aro.org, sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
        Mark.Rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        neeraju@...eaurora.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
        Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 clocksource 6/7] clocksource: Forgive tsc_early
 pre-calibration drift

Hi Paul,

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 03:47:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Because the x86 tsc_early clocksource is given a quick and semi-accurate
> calibration (by design!), it might have drift rates well in excess of
> the 0.1% limit that is in the process of being adopted.
> 
> Therefore, add a max_drift field to the clocksource structure that, when
> non-zero, specifies the maximum allowable drift rate in nanoseconds over
> a half-second period.  The tsc_early clocksource initializes this to five
> miliseconds, which corresponds to the 1% drift rate limit suggested by
> Xing Zhengjun.  This max_drift field is intended only for early boot,
> so clocksource_watchdog() splats if it encounters a non-zero value in
> this field more than 60 seconds after boot, inspired by a suggestion by
> Thomas Gleixner.
> 
> This was tested by setting the clocksource_tsc ->max_drift field to 1,
> which, as expected, resulted in a clock-skew event.

We've run the same last for this v10, and those 'unstable' thing [1] can
not be reproduced!

We've reported one case that tsc can be wrongly judged as 'unstable'
by 'refined-jiffies' watchdog [1], while reducing the threshold could
make it easier to be triggered.

It could be reproduced on the a plaform with a 115200 serial console,
and hpet been disabled (several x86 platforms has this), add 
'initcall_debug' cmdline parameter to get more debug message, we can
see:

[    1.134197] clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU1: Marking clocksource 'tsc-early' as unstable because the skew is too large:
[    1.134214] clocksource:                       'refined-jiffies' wd_nesc: 500000000 wd_now: ffff8b35 wd_last: ffff8b03 mask: ffffffff
[    1.134217] clocksource:                       'tsc-early' cs_nsec: 507537855 cs_now: 4e63c9d09 cs_last: 4bebd81f5 mask: ffffffffffffffff
[    1.134220] clocksource:                       No current clocksource.
[    1.134222] tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to clocksource watchdog

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210420064934.GE31773@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ 
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201126012421.GA92582@shbuild999.sh.intel.com/

Thanks,
Feng

> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c       |  1 +
>  include/linux/clocksource.h |  5 +++++
>  kernel/time/clocksource.c   | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> index 56289170753c..7192b8950322 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> @@ -1127,6 +1127,7 @@ static int tsc_cs_enable(struct clocksource *cs)
>  static struct clocksource clocksource_tsc_early = {
>  	.name			= "tsc-early",
>  	.rating			= 299,
> +	.max_drift		= 5 * NSEC_PER_MSEC,
>  	.read			= read_tsc,
>  	.mask			= CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(64),
>  	.flags			= CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS |
> diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> index 83a3ebff7456..07d25a158d7a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ struct module;
>   * @shift:		Cycle to nanosecond divisor (power of two)
>   * @max_idle_ns:	Maximum idle time permitted by the clocksource (nsecs)
>   * @maxadj:		Maximum adjustment value to mult (~11%)
> + * @max_drift:		Maximum drift rate in nanoseconds per half second.
> + *			Zero says to use default WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD.
> + *			A non-zero value for ->max_drift more than 60 seconds after boot
> + *			will result in a splat.
>   * @archdata:		Optional arch-specific data
>   * @max_cycles:		Maximum safe cycle value which won't overflow on
>   *			multiplication
> @@ -93,6 +97,7 @@ struct clocksource {
>  	u32			shift;
>  	u64			max_idle_ns;
>  	u32			maxadj;
> +	u32			max_drift;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA
>  	struct arch_clocksource_data archdata;
>  #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index f71f375df544..070b09dab815 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static void __clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating);
>   */
>  #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
>  #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
> +#define WATCHDOG_SYNC_FORGIVENESS (HZ * 60UL)
>  
>  /*
>   * Maximum permissible delay between two readouts of the watchdog
> @@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
>  	int next_cpu, reset_pending;
>  	int64_t wd_nsec, cs_nsec;
>  	struct clocksource *cs;
> +	u32 md;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&watchdog_lock);
>  	if (!watchdog_running)
> @@ -423,7 +425,22 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		/* Check the deviation from the watchdog clocksource. */
> -		if (abs(cs_nsec - wd_nsec) > WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD) {
> +		if (!cs->max_drift) {
> +			md = WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD;
> +		} else {
> +			static unsigned long first_jiffies;
> +			static bool beenhere;
> +
> +			if (beenhere) {
> +				WARN_ON_ONCE(time_after(jiffies,
> +							first_jiffies + WATCHDOG_SYNC_FORGIVENESS));
> +			} else {
> +				beenhere = true;
> +				first_jiffies = jiffies;
> +			}
> +			md = cs->max_drift;
> +		}
> +		if (abs(cs_nsec - wd_nsec) > md) {
>  			pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Marking clocksource '%s' as unstable because the skew is too large:\n",
>  				smp_processor_id(), cs->name);
>  			pr_warn("                      '%s' wd_now: %llx wd_last: %llx mask: %llx\n",
> -- 
> 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ