| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210426152529.GX975577@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 08:25:29 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
john.stultz@...aro.org, sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
Mark.Rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com,
neeraju@...eaurora.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 clocksource 6/7] clocksource: Forgive tsc_early
pre-calibration drift
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:01:27PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 03:47:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Because the x86 tsc_early clocksource is given a quick and semi-accurate
> > calibration (by design!), it might have drift rates well in excess of
> > the 0.1% limit that is in the process of being adopted.
> >
> > Therefore, add a max_drift field to the clocksource structure that, when
> > non-zero, specifies the maximum allowable drift rate in nanoseconds over
> > a half-second period. The tsc_early clocksource initializes this to five
> > miliseconds, which corresponds to the 1% drift rate limit suggested by
> > Xing Zhengjun. This max_drift field is intended only for early boot,
> > so clocksource_watchdog() splats if it encounters a non-zero value in
> > this field more than 60 seconds after boot, inspired by a suggestion by
> > Thomas Gleixner.
> >
> > This was tested by setting the clocksource_tsc ->max_drift field to 1,
> > which, as expected, resulted in a clock-skew event.
>
> We've run the same last for this v10, and those 'unstable' thing [1] can
> not be reproduced!
Good to hear! ;-)
> We've reported one case that tsc can be wrongly judged as 'unstable'
> by 'refined-jiffies' watchdog [1], while reducing the threshold could
> make it easier to be triggered.
>
> It could be reproduced on the a plaform with a 115200 serial console,
> and hpet been disabled (several x86 platforms has this), add
> 'initcall_debug' cmdline parameter to get more debug message, we can
> see:
>
> [ 1.134197] clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU1: Marking clocksource 'tsc-early' as unstable because the skew is too large:
> [ 1.134214] clocksource: 'refined-jiffies' wd_nesc: 500000000 wd_now: ffff8b35 wd_last: ffff8b03 mask: ffffffff
> [ 1.134217] clocksource: 'tsc-early' cs_nsec: 507537855 cs_now: 4e63c9d09 cs_last: 4bebd81f5 mask: ffffffffffffffff
> [ 1.134220] clocksource: No current clocksource.
> [ 1.134222] tsc: Marking TSC unstable due to clocksource watchdog
Just to make sure I understand: "could be reproduced" as in this is the
result from v9, and v10 avoids this, correct?
Thanx, Paul
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210420064934.GE31773@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
> [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201126012421.GA92582@shbuild999.sh.intel.com/
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
> > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 1 +
> > include/linux/clocksource.h | 5 +++++
> > kernel/time/clocksource.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > index 56289170753c..7192b8950322 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
> > @@ -1127,6 +1127,7 @@ static int tsc_cs_enable(struct clocksource *cs)
> > static struct clocksource clocksource_tsc_early = {
> > .name = "tsc-early",
> > .rating = 299,
> > + .max_drift = 5 * NSEC_PER_MSEC,
> > .read = read_tsc,
> > .mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(64),
> > .flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS |
> > diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > index 83a3ebff7456..07d25a158d7a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ struct module;
> > * @shift: Cycle to nanosecond divisor (power of two)
> > * @max_idle_ns: Maximum idle time permitted by the clocksource (nsecs)
> > * @maxadj: Maximum adjustment value to mult (~11%)
> > + * @max_drift: Maximum drift rate in nanoseconds per half second.
> > + * Zero says to use default WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD.
> > + * A non-zero value for ->max_drift more than 60 seconds after boot
> > + * will result in a splat.
> > * @archdata: Optional arch-specific data
> > * @max_cycles: Maximum safe cycle value which won't overflow on
> > * multiplication
> > @@ -93,6 +97,7 @@ struct clocksource {
> > u32 shift;
> > u64 max_idle_ns;
> > u32 maxadj;
> > + u32 max_drift;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA
> > struct arch_clocksource_data archdata;
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > index f71f375df544..070b09dab815 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static void __clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating);
> > */
> > #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
> > #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
> > +#define WATCHDOG_SYNC_FORGIVENESS (HZ * 60UL)
> >
> > /*
> > * Maximum permissible delay between two readouts of the watchdog
> > @@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
> > int next_cpu, reset_pending;
> > int64_t wd_nsec, cs_nsec;
> > struct clocksource *cs;
> > + u32 md;
> >
> > spin_lock(&watchdog_lock);
> > if (!watchdog_running)
> > @@ -423,7 +425,22 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(struct timer_list *unused)
> > continue;
> >
> > /* Check the deviation from the watchdog clocksource. */
> > - if (abs(cs_nsec - wd_nsec) > WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD) {
> > + if (!cs->max_drift) {
> > + md = WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD;
> > + } else {
> > + static unsigned long first_jiffies;
> > + static bool beenhere;
> > +
> > + if (beenhere) {
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(time_after(jiffies,
> > + first_jiffies + WATCHDOG_SYNC_FORGIVENESS));
> > + } else {
> > + beenhere = true;
> > + first_jiffies = jiffies;
> > + }
> > + md = cs->max_drift;
> > + }
> > + if (abs(cs_nsec - wd_nsec) > md) {
> > pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: Marking clocksource '%s' as unstable because the skew is too large:\n",
> > smp_processor_id(), cs->name);
> > pr_warn(" '%s' wd_now: %llx wd_last: %llx mask: %llx\n",
> > --
> > 2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists