linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: minor nit fixes, no functional change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:48:22 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Ravi Kumar Bokka (Temp)" <rbokka@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: minor nit fixes, no functional change


On 4/23/2021 8:34 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:05 AM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Fix a missed newline, and update a comment which is stale
>> after the merge of '5a1bea2a: nvmem: qfprom: Add support for fuse
>> blowing on sc7280'
>> No other functional change in this patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Sending a follow-up patch for these nits since they came in after
>> the previous patch was already pulled in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1401964/
>>
>>   drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
>> index d6d3f24..b7d2060 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
>> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct qfprom_soc_compatible_data sc7280_qfprom = {
>>          .keepout = sc7280_qfprom_keepout,
>>          .nkeepout = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7280_qfprom_keepout)
>>   };
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * qfprom_disable_fuse_blowing() - Undo enabling of fuse blowing.
>>    * @priv: Our driver data.
>> @@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
>>          }
>>
>>          /*
>> -        * Hardware requires 1.8V min for fuse blowing; this may be
>> +        * Hardware requires a min voltage for fuse blowing; this may be
>>           * a rail shared do don't specify a max--regulator constraints
>>           * will handle.
>>           */
> 
> Thanks for sending these! Is there a reason you didn't do the "else
> if" change too?

Oops, sorry, looks like i didn't scroll all the way down.
Sending a v2 shortly.

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation