linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 160/190] Revert "Staging: rts5208: Fix error handling on rtsx_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YIhMoRY2tFx3nym5@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:40:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 160/190] Revert "Staging: rts5208: Fix error handling on
 rtsx_send_cmd"

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:00:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This reverts commit c8c2702409430a6a2fd928e857f15773aaafcc99.
> 
> Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> malicious" changes.  The result of these submissions can be found in a
> paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> 
> Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> they actually are a valid fix.  Until that work is complete, remove this
> change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> codebase.
> 
> Cc: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> index 25c31496757e..63f5465a6eeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> @@ -4424,12 +4424,7 @@ int sd_execute_write_data(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip)
>  		rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
>  		rtsx_add_cmd(chip, CHECK_REG_CMD, 0xFD30, 0x02, 0x02);
>  
> -		retval = rtsx_send_cmd(chip, SD_CARD, 250);
> -		if (retval < 0) {
> -			write_err = true;
> -			rtsx_clear_sd_error(chip);
> -			goto sd_execute_write_cmd_failed;
> -		}
> +		rtsx_send_cmd(chip, SD_CARD, 250);
>  
>  		retval = sd_update_lock_status(chip);
>  		if (retval != STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

The original looks correct to me, so I'll drop the revert.

greg k-h