[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bl9zczqx.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:07:50 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: bilbao@...edu, Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, bp@...en8.de,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed typo in Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
bilbao@...edu writes:
OK, we're getting closer...
> Hello Jon, thanks a lot for your feedback, it was instructive. I attach changelog and the patch as plain text below.
A comment like this should go below the "---" line; otherwise it has to
be edited out when the patch is applied.
> I fix two typos in the documentation (Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst), changing 'paing' for
> 'paging' and using the right verbal form for plural on 'some vendors offer'.
Please keep changelogs below the 80-column limit. Some maintainers will
also get grumpy with you for not using the imperative form ("Fix two
typos") here.
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
> ---
> Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> index 44856417e6a5..b792bbdc0b01 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
>
> Overview
> ========
> -Original x86-64 was limited by 4-level paing to 256 TiB of virtual address
> +Original x86-64 was limited by 4-level paging to 256 TiB of virtual address
> space and 64 TiB of physical address space. We are already bumping into
> -this limit: some vendors offers servers with 64 TiB of memory today.
> +this limit: some vendors offer servers with 64 TiB of memory today.
>
> To overcome the limitation upcoming hardware will introduce support for
> 5-level paging. It is a straight-forward extension of the current page
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 11:45:45 AM EDT Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu> writes:
>> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
Just about *all* maintainers will get grumpy with you for top posting;
never do that. Especially not for patches, but just don't do it ever.
I've fixed these things up and applied (what appears to be) your first
kernel patch. Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists