linux-kernel - Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection: baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:51:47 +0100
From:   Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
To:     kernelci-results@...ups.io, broonie@...nel.org,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection:
 baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2

+Heiko +Michael

On 27/04/2021 11:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:28:34AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
>>>> If so, all sai1 - sai6 are using "fsl,vf610-sai",
>>>> all saiX doesn't have .name. I think it should have different name.
>>>> In your case, at least, sai5 / sai6 needs to have
> 
>>> You could send a patch along with re-adding the three patches I dropped?
> 
>> Thanks, I can do it.
>> But I want to confirm above first.
>> Let's keep Guillaume's happiness :)
> 
> This board is in the Kontron lab - KernelCI is just reporting results
> from it, we'd need to connect with someone from Kontron for system
> specific questions.  Guillaume, I don't know what e-mail they wanted to
> be used here?


We can have KernelCI tests re-run with extra kernel patches in
any lab, but yes for discussing actual changes related to the
platform it's best to ask Kontron folks directly.

Heiko, Michael, is this something you can please help with?


Best wishes,
Guillaume


P.S. archive: https://groups.io/g/kernelci-results/topic/broonie_sound_for_next/82277947