lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea2b6dae-3087-67d3-8473-410255a51e23@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:51:47 +0100
From:   Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
To:     kernelci-results@...ups.io, broonie@...nel.org,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection:
 baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2

+Heiko +Michael

On 27/04/2021 11:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:28:34AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
>>>> If so, all sai1 - sai6 are using "fsl,vf610-sai",
>>>> all saiX doesn't have .name. I think it should have different name.
>>>> In your case, at least, sai5 / sai6 needs to have
> 
>>> You could send a patch along with re-adding the three patches I dropped?
> 
>> Thanks, I can do it.
>> But I want to confirm above first.
>> Let's keep Guillaume's happiness :)
> 
> This board is in the Kontron lab - KernelCI is just reporting results
> from it, we'd need to connect with someone from Kontron for system
> specific questions.  Guillaume, I don't know what e-mail they wanted to
> be used here?


We can have KernelCI tests re-run with extra kernel patches in
any lab, but yes for discussing actual changes related to the
platform it's best to ask Kontron folks directly.

Heiko, Michael, is this something you can please help with?


Best wishes,
Guillaume


P.S. archive: https://groups.io/g/kernelci-results/topic/broonie_sound_for_next/82277947

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ