linux-kernel - Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection: baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e20b9c8a2715b5d091a8d1f37ba890b4@walle.cc>
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:43:42 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
Cc:     kernelci-results@...ups.io, broonie@...nel.org,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection:
 baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2

Hi,

Am 2021-04-27 14:51, schrieb Guillaume Tucker:
> +Heiko +Michael
> 
> On 27/04/2021 11:19, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:28:34AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>> 
>>>>> If so, all sai1 - sai6 are using "fsl,vf610-sai",
>>>>> all saiX doesn't have .name. I think it should have different name.
>>>>> In your case, at least, sai5 / sai6 needs to have
>> 
>>>> You could send a patch along with re-adding the three patches I 
>>>> dropped?
>> 
>>> Thanks, I can do it.
>>> But I want to confirm above first.
>>> Let's keep Guillaume's happiness :)
>> 
>> This board is in the Kontron lab - KernelCI is just reporting results
>> from it, we'd need to connect with someone from Kontron for system
>> specific questions.  Guillaume, I don't know what e-mail they wanted 
>> to
>> be used here?
> 
> 
> We can have KernelCI tests re-run with extra kernel patches in
> any lab, but yes for discussing actual changes related to the
> platform it's best to ask Kontron folks directly.
> 
> Heiko, Michael, is this something you can please help with?

Sure, just put me on CC and I can test the patches manually.

-michael