linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 177/190] Revert "hwmon: (lm80) fix a missing check of bus read in lm80 probe"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YIgcDZu1GjN9wXFm@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:13:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 177/190] Revert "hwmon: (lm80) fix a missing check of bus
 read in lm80 probe"

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 07:03:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 4/21/21 6:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit 9aa3aa15f4c2f74f47afd6c5db4b420fadf3f315.
> > 
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes.  The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> > 
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix.  Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> > 
> > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 
> I don't immediately see a problem with this patch, but the other patch
> introduced at the same time by the same author was indeed malicious,
> and the bug it introduced was easy to overlook, so I agree that
> this patch should be reverted.
> 
> [ When introducing error handling into this probe function, errors
>   in lm80_init_client() should be addressed as well. This patch did
>   not do that and thus had limited value anyway. ]

Thanks for the review!

greg k-h