[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871raveno6.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:45:45 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, bp@...en8.de,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed typo in Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
> ---
> Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> index 44856417e6a5..b792bbdc0b01 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/5level-paging.rst
> @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
>
> Overview
> ========
> -Original x86-64 was limited by 4-level paing to 256 TiB of virtual address
> +Original x86-64 was limited by 4-level paging to 256 TiB of virtual address
> space and 64 TiB of physical address space. We are already bumping into
> -this limit: some vendors offers servers with 64 TiB of memory today.
> +this limit: some vendors offer servers with 64 TiB of memory today.
So this seems like a good change, but I need to make a couple of
requests:
- Please include a changelog, even with relatively simple patches like
this.
- Patches should be sent as plain text, inline in the mail - not as
attachments and *certainly* not as HTML. Have a look at
Documentation/process/email-clients.rst if you need some guidance on
configuring your email setup.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists