[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210428224153.GA15709@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:41:53 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-binding: interrupt-controller: Add missing interrupts
property
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:15:09PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:42:00 +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > Interrupts property is required, so add it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/interrupt-controller/idt,32434-pic.yaml | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun4i-a10-ic.example.dt.yaml: interrupt-controller@...0400: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> 'interrupts' is a required property
> 'interrupts-extended' is a required property
> From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun4i-a10-ic.yaml
now I'm confused... is this a problem of your test ? make dt_binding_check
was ok with that change...
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists