[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ce3614e-af79-2a36-de83-6cbb4d9fe9a4@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:06:10 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, hch@....de,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DMA mapping fill dma_address to 0
On 2021-04-28 09:42, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> Hello
>
> I work on the crypto offloader driver of cortina/gemini SL3516 SoC.
> I test it by filling a LUKS2 partition.
> I got a reproductible problem when handling skcipher requests.
> I use dma_map_sg() and when iterating other the result, sg_dma_address(sg) return 0.
> But sg_dma_len(sg) is still correct (4096 in my case).
>
> Below is a simplified view of my code:
> nr_sgs = dma_map_sg(ce->dev, areq->src, sg_nents(areq->src), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> (nr_sgs = 1 in my case)
> sg = areq->src;
> if (!sg_dma_address(sg))
> FAIL
What is this check supposed to be for in the first place? 0 is a valid
DMA address, because it's also a valid physical address, and I recall
RAM at PA 0 on Hikey 960 flushing out some bugs in the past when we
tried to use 0 for DMA_MAPPING_ERROR. All the Gemini DTs appear to show
RAM starting at PA 0 too, so I'd have to guess that it's simply the case
that your DMA buffer happened to end up using that particular page.
Robin.
> I have digged to find what do dma_map_sg() and I have added some debug.
> sg_page(sg) return c7efb000 for example so sg_page() works.
> But it seems the problem is that page_to_phys(sg_page(sg)) return 0.
>
> This problem does not appear immediatly, luksOpen and subsequent fsck always work.
> But it appears fast after, when mouting or rsync files in it.
>
> I have added CONFIG_DEBUG_SG, CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG, CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG but they didnt bringed any more hints.
> Only "DMA-API: cacheline tracking ENOMEM, dma-debug disabled" appears but always with some "time" between my problem and its display.
> So I am not sure it is related.
>
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists