[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5e90fededc64ca2b8a29245a7d1d798@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:18:07 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "'mceier+kernel@...il.com'" <mceier+kernel@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
CC: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/13] [RFC] Rust support
From: Mariusz Ceier
> Sent: 29 April 2021 06:21
>
> On 28/04/2021, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34 AM Mariusz Ceier <mceier+kernel@...il.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe it would also be worthwhile to make the requirement that the
> >> kernel must be buildable with free software (not just open source
> >> software) explicit ?
> >
> > The kernel is already buildable by LLVM (and clang); in fact Android,
> > CrOS, and Google's production servers already do so.
> > https://clangbuiltlinux.github.io/
>
> LLVM/clang is not free software (it's just open source), so it doesn't
> matter if kernel builds or not with it. What should matter is whether
> it is buildable with at least one GPL compiler like GCC.
I suspect that what matters for most people is whether the required
compilers (etc) are installed by a default-ish install of their
favourite distribution.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists