linux-kernel - Re: wait_for_initramfs warning from kernel_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45556f52-cd2f-5512-ba65-81e4acee21ff@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 10:18:50 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: wait_for_initramfs warning from kernel_init_freeable()

On 29/04/2021 09.16, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 29.04.2021 08:46, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Since 97f8172f9a98 ("init/initramfs.c: do unpacking asynchronously") I get
>> the following warning early in the boot process from umh:
>> "wait_for_initramfs() called before rootfs_initcalls"
>> Some debugging lead me to the following call chain:
>>
>> kernel_init_freeable()
>> -> do_basic_setup()
>>    -> driver_init()
>>       -> platform_bus_init()
>>          -> bus_register()
>>             -> kset_register()
>>                -> kobject_uvent()
>>
> 
> Sorry, this is the first umh call, but at this time UMH_DISABLED is still set.
> The first umh call where UMH is enabled is the following:
> 
> kernel_init_freeable()
> -> do_basic_setup()
>    -> do_initcalls()
>       -> do_one_initcall()
>          -> wq_sysfs_init()         <- core_initcall()
>             -> subsys_virtual_register()
>                -> bus_register()
> 

Thanks for the report. Do you have CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER=y and
CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH set to a non-empty string? Assuming yes:

I did notice that on backporting those patches to an old BSP of ours,
but the other platforms I had done those patches for didn't have
UEVENT_HELPER set, so didn't know about until about a week ago.

Emitting calls to /sbin/hotplug before the initramfs has had a chance to
begin being unpacked is a complete waste of cycles (it's a _lot_ of
kernel threads being forked only to fail with -ENOENT because there's no
such binary, or any other fs contents for that matter). Just keeping
CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER set but clearing CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH (if
actually needed, userspace can set it appropriately later) made booting
quite noticably faster on that old and slow cpu.

So in a sense, that warning has served its purpose: drawing attention to
a deficiency in the boot process (at least with such a .config).

A few options:

(1) Do nothing, have people reconsider whether they really need
UEVENT_HELPER_PATH set.

(2) Move the usermodehelper_enable() call from do_basic_setup() to
around rootfs_initcall time. Perhaps in populate_rootfs() itself, right
after scheduling do_populate_rootfs(). And a similar call would need to
be added in default_rootfs() in noinitramfs.c for the
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=n case. Or a separate rootfs_initcall() in
kernel/umh.c itself, if we can rely on link order to put that after
populate_rootfs.

I think (2) would eliminate the warning, but then the very first uevent
from some random device probe will cause that wait_for_initramfs(), i.e.
it will effectively end up making the initramfs unpacking synchronous
for anybody with CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER_PATH!="". I can live with that, of
course, but OTOH it's a bit sad that they'd never have a way to know
that they could boot faster by eliminating a legacy setting from their
.config.

Rasmus