linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:44:30 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Replace 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 14:24:54 +0200
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> wrote:

> Replaced 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' because the second is preferred.
> Detected by checkpatch.pl.

Please do not fix existing code because of "preferred" coding style from
checkpatch.pl. It causes unnecessary churn, and a waste of time applying it.

"unsigned" is just as good as "unsigned int" , and honestly, that's what I
prefer.

NACK.

-- Steve