[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161974927117.177949.8019204674384480875@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:21:11 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for duty-cycle for RCG
Quoting Taniya Das (2021-04-28 23:55:16)
> Thank you for your review.
>
> On 4/28/2021 5:49 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Taniya Das (2021-04-25 00:08:21)
> >> The root clock generators with MND divider has the capability to support
> >> change in duty-cycle by updating the 'D'. Add the clock ops which would
> >> check all the boundary conditions and enable setting the desired duty-cycle
> >> as per the consumer.
> >>
> >> [v3]
> >> * Implement clockops for get_duty_cycle.
> >> * Return -EINVAL for Non-MND or HID RCGs.
> >
> > We don't need cover letters for single patches. Please add these details
> > after the dash before the diffstat on the single patch.
> >
>
> Sure Stephen, will take care from next time. Let me know in case I need
> to re-submit the patch again.
>
Don't think so. Merge window is open so I'll apply it in another week.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists