[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YI2yZ+10MGrlFDBg@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 15:56:23 -0400
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] Speculative page faults (anon vmas only)
Hey Michel,
I tried running xfstests against the spf branch, and I've noticed it's
causing regression for generic/619. It's failing due to a umount
failure due to a busy mount point:
QA output created by 619
umount: /vdc: target is busy.
I haven't had a chance to investigate, but I thought I should let you know.q
Cheers,
- Ted
View attachment "619.full" of type "text/plain" (40937 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists