[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfZKX_oYzoAA9Mbya1_+hP6+1mDKqyfy9d=hsokEAGQsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 23:56:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/12] nfsd: Avoid non-flexible API in seq_quote_mem()
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:54 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:49:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > string_escape_mem_ascii() followed by seq_escape_mem_ascii() is completely
> > non-flexible and shouldn't be exist from day 1.
> >
> > Replace it with properly called string_escape_mem().
>
> NAKed-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Reason: use of seq_get_buf(). Which should have been static inline in
> fs/seq_file.c, to start with.
I see.
> Again, any new uses of seq_get_buf()/seq_commit() are grounds for automatic
> NAK. These interfaces *will* be withdrawn.
You meant that this is no way to get rid of this guy?
Any suggestions how to replace that API with a newer one?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists