[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210503074217.GA1557@agape.jhs>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 09:42:18 +0200
From: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/43] staging: rtl8723bs: remove if-else blocks left
empty by ODM_RT_TRACE deletion
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 10:27:11AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:56:24PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > @@ -1533,13 +1529,10 @@ static void phy_IQCalibrate_8723B(
> > result[t][6] = (PHY_QueryBBReg(pDM_Odm->Adapter, rRx_Power_Before_IQK_A_2, bMaskDWord)&0x3FF0000)>>16;
> > result[t][7] = (PHY_QueryBBReg(pDM_Odm->Adapter, rRx_Power_After_IQK_A_2, bMaskDWord)&0x3FF0000)>>16;
> > break;
> > - } else {
> > }
> > }
> >
> > /* Allen end */
>
> This comment doesn't mean anything. It feels like it was supposed to
> go with the code that you deleted so it should have been deleted as part
> of deleting the empty block. But it's fine to me if you delete it in
> a later patch.
Hi Dan,
ok I will.
>
> > - if (0x00 == PathBOK) {
> > - }
> > }
> >
> > /* Back to BB mode, load original value */
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
thank you,
fabio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists