[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5ca055cf46147537748c7186a6a031ab7663ad8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 01:35:57 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/35] tty: make tty_get_byte_size available
On Thu, 2021-05-06 at 11:24 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thursday, May 6, 2021, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
[]
> > Perhaps clearer not testing account_flags multiple times.
> >
> > unsigned char tty_get_byte_size(unsigned int cflag, bool account_flags)
> > {
> > unsigned char bits;
> >
> > /* byte size and parity */
nit: byte size, the parity bit is tested later.
> > switch (cflag & CSIZE) {
> > case CS5:
> > bits = 5;
> > break;
> > case CS6:
> > bits = 6;
> > break;
> > case CS7:
> > bits = 7;
> > break;
> > case CS8:
> > default:
> > bits = 8;
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > if (account_flags) {
>
>
>
> if (!account_flags)
> return bits;
>
> ?
<shrug> six vs half dozen: 2 level indentation vs early return.
I don't think 2 level indentation is too many.
> > bits += 2; /* start/stop bits */
> >
> > if (cflag & CSTOPB)
> > bits++;
> >
> > if (cflag & PARENB)
> > bits++;
> > }
Maybe comment each test as CSTOPB and PARENB aren't completely obvious.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists