linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210507101926.25631-3-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Date:   Fri,  7 May 2021 18:19:24 +0800
From:   "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To:     jassisinghbrar@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, o.rempel@...gutronix.de
Cc:     kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, aisheng.dong@....com,
        linux-imx@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mailbox: imx: replace the xTR/xRR array with single register

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>

The xTR/xRR registers are using 4 bytes stride and continuous.
Considering we will support more TR and RR registers, use base + idx * 4
method to calculate register address, not hardcoding in driver.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
 drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 2543c7b6948b..bd7758c32a80 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ struct imx_mu_dcfg {
 	int (*tx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp, void *data);
 	int (*rx)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp);
 	void (*init)(struct imx_mu_priv *priv);
-	u32	xTR[4];		/* Transmit Registers */
-	u32	xRR[4];		/* Receive Registers */
+	u32	xTR;		/* Transmit Register0 */
+	u32	xRR;		/* Receive Register0 */
 	u32	xSR;		/* Status Register */
 	u32	xCR;		/* Control Register */
 };
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 
 	switch (cp->type) {
 	case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
-		imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
+		imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR + cp->idx * 4);
 		imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
 		break;
 	case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 {
 	u32 dat;
 
-	dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
+	dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (cp->idx) * 4);
 	mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&dat);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 		}
 
 		for (i = 0; i < 4 && i < msg->hdr.size; i++)
-			imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
+			imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
 		for (; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) {
 			ret = readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + priv->dcfg->xSR,
 						 xsr,
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 				dev_err(priv->dev, "Send data index: %d timeout\n", i);
 				return ret;
 			}
-			imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);
+			imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR + (i % 4) * 4);
 		}
 
 		imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 	u32 xsr;
 
 	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
-	*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
+	*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR);
 
 	if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg) / 4) {
 		dev_err(priv->dev, "Maximal message size (%zu bytes) exceeded on RX; got: %i bytes\n", sizeof(msg), msg.hdr.size << 2);
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
 			dev_err(priv->dev, "timeout read idx %d\n", i);
 			return ret;
 		}
-		*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);
+		*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % 4) * 4);
 	}
 
 	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
@@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_generic_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_generic_rx,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_generic,
-	.xTR	= {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
-	.xRR	= {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
+	.xTR	= 0x0,
+	.xRR	= 0x10,
 	.xSR	= 0x20,
 	.xCR	= 0x24,
 };
@@ -574,8 +574,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_generic_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_generic_rx,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_generic,
-	.xTR	= {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
-	.xRR	= {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
+	.xTR	= 0x20,
+	.xRR	= 0x40,
 	.xSR	= 0x60,
 	.xCR	= 0x64,
 };
@@ -584,8 +584,8 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
 	.tx	= imx_mu_scu_tx,
 	.rx	= imx_mu_scu_rx,
 	.init	= imx_mu_init_scu,
-	.xTR	= {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
-	.xRR	= {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
+	.xTR	= 0x0
+	.xRR	= 0x10
 	.xSR	= 0x20,
 	.xCR	= 0x24,
 };
-- 
2.30.0