[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUGRU+vi5NfYLBV9dXgZcG0WY45srsi3Q75T7pPLBLnMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 08:46:19 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Silence warning for ArchStd files
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/05/2021 23:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > json files in the level 1 directory are used for ArchStd events (see
> > preprocess_arch_std_files), as such they shouldn't be warned about.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > index ed4f0bd72e5a..7422b0ea8790 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > @@ -1123,8 +1123,10 @@ static int process_one_file(const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
> > mapfile = strdup(fpath);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -
> > - pr_info("%s: Ignoring file %s\n", prog, fpath);
> > + if (is_json_file(bname))
> > + pr_debug("%s: ArchStd json is preprocessed %s\n", prog, fpath)
> We could get more elaborate and add the same first debug print in
> process_one_file() to preprocess_arch_std_file() to give the allusion
> that they are preprocessed, and change the logic not print that for arch
> std files (in process_one_file()). But not sure it's worth it.
>
> Or else we could also just omit any print here for archstd files here.
I thought about just dropping the print in the json case but then a
comment would be nice, the pr_debug is a comment and is somewhat
intention revealing. If you think it is overkill then it is ok to
change.
Thanks,
Ian
> But I suppose what you are doing is ok...
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> > + else
> > + pr_info("%s: Ignoring file %s\n", prog, fpath);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists