linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Silence warning for ArchStd files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <946c888e-7918-3692-ecdd-9f4706cbc764@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 May 2021 17:29:06 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Silence warning for ArchStd files

On 07/05/2021 16:46, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM John Garry<john.garry@...wei.com>  wrote:
>> On 06/05/2021 23:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>> json files in the level 1 directory are used for ArchStd events (see
>>> preprocess_arch_std_files), as such they shouldn't be warned about.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers<irogers@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>>    tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 6 ++++--
>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
>>> index ed4f0bd72e5a..7422b0ea8790 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
>>> @@ -1123,8 +1123,10 @@ static int process_one_file(const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
>>>                        mapfile = strdup(fpath);
>>>                        return 0;
>>>                }
>>> -
>>> -             pr_info("%s: Ignoring file %s\n", prog, fpath);
>>> +             if (is_json_file(bname))
>>> +                     pr_debug("%s: ArchStd json is preprocessed %s\n", prog, fpath)
>> We could get more elaborate and add the same first debug print in
>> process_one_file() to preprocess_arch_std_file() to give the allusion
>> that they are preprocessed, and change the logic not print that for arch
>> std files (in process_one_file()). But not sure it's worth it.
>>
>> Or else we could also just omit any print here for archstd files here.
> I thought about just dropping the print in the json case but then a
> comment would be nice, the pr_debug is a comment and is somewhat
> intention revealing. If you think it is overkill then it is ok to
> change.

I don't think it's a big deal either way.

Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>