linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Silence warning for ArchStd files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJafLNqrrP3RHx+v@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 8 May 2021 11:24:44 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Silence warning for ArchStd files

Em Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:29:06PM +0100, John Garry escreveu:
> On 07/05/2021 16:46, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM John Garry<john.garry@...wei.com>  wrote:
> > > On 06/05/2021 23:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > json files in the level 1 directory are used for ArchStd events (see
> > > > preprocess_arch_std_files), as such they shouldn't be warned about.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers<irogers@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >    tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 6 ++++--
> > > >    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > > > index ed4f0bd72e5a..7422b0ea8790 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > > > @@ -1123,8 +1123,10 @@ static int process_one_file(const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
> > > >                        mapfile = strdup(fpath);
> > > >                        return 0;
> > > >                }
> > > > -
> > > > -             pr_info("%s: Ignoring file %s\n", prog, fpath);
> > > > +             if (is_json_file(bname))
> > > > +                     pr_debug("%s: ArchStd json is preprocessed %s\n", prog, fpath)
> > > We could get more elaborate and add the same first debug print in
> > > process_one_file() to preprocess_arch_std_file() to give the allusion
> > > that they are preprocessed, and change the logic not print that for arch
> > > std files (in process_one_file()). But not sure it's worth it.
> > > 
> > > Or else we could also just omit any print here for archstd files here.
> > I thought about just dropping the print in the json case but then a
> > comment would be nice, the pr_debug is a comment and is somewhat
> > intention revealing. If you think it is overkill then it is ok to
> > change.
> 
> I don't think it's a big deal either way.
> 
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo