linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Use the same init resources for MSM8996 and MSM8998

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 May 2021 22:37:22 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Cc:     Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Use the same init resources
 for MSM8996 and MSM8998

On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 06:56:22PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> > NACK.
> >
> > I see that the "slpi_resource_init" and "msm8998_{slpi/adsp}_resource" are
> > completely different, even the firmware name. How can you get it to work?
> 
> one of us must be looking at some knock-off source code, as they are identical say for the presence or absence of proxy_pd_names, which are required for 8996 and weren't really an exposed thing on old SoCs like 8974.
> 

Actually "msm8998_adsp_resource" is what different from "slpi_resource_init" and
"msm8998_slpi_resource" looks good. So you can just add the proxy votes to
"slpi_resource_init".

Thanks,
Mani

> 
> Konrad
>