[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210507170722.GB3919@thinkpad>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 22:37:22 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
Cc: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Use the same init resources
for MSM8996 and MSM8998
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 06:56:22PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > NACK.
> >
> > I see that the "slpi_resource_init" and "msm8998_{slpi/adsp}_resource" are
> > completely different, even the firmware name. How can you get it to work?
>
> one of us must be looking at some knock-off source code, as they are identical say for the presence or absence of proxy_pd_names, which are required for 8996 and weren't really an exposed thing on old SoCs like 8974.
>
Actually "msm8998_adsp_resource" is what different from "slpi_resource_init" and
"msm8998_slpi_resource" looks good. So you can just add the proxy votes to
"slpi_resource_init".
Thanks,
Mani
>
> Konrad
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists