[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210507171050.GV1370958@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 14:10:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and
allocation APIs
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 11:06:14AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> We had tossed around an idea of a super-container with vfio, it's maybe
> something we'd want to incorporate into this design. For instance, if
> memory could be pre-registered with a super container, which would
> handle the locked memory accounting for that memory, then
> sub-containers could all handle the IOMMU context of their sets of
> devices relative to that common memory pool.
This is where I suggested to David to use nesting of IOASIDs.
Without HW support for nesting a SW nest is really just re-using the
memory registration information stored in the parent when constructing
the children
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists