linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Remove some dead code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOc6etaUPtJqoH9DBDE72nDW7s7iEZHnaJRpKx9zFow02WOZig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 May 2021 08:38:32 -0600
From:   Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@...il.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     cw00.choi@...sung.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Remove some dead code

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 11:43 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
>         if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_dev)) {
>                 ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_dev);
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register RTC device: %d\n", ret);

Following the recent conversations, I think it might make sense to do
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register RTC device: %pe\n", info->rtc_dev);

Is that right?