[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210508103842.7dc6e8b1@alex-virtual-machine>
Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 10:38:42 +0800
From: Aili Yao <yaoaili@...gsoft.com>
To: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA堀口 直也)"
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Jue Wang" <juew@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yaoaili126@...il.com" <yaoaili126@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action
Required MCE
On Fri, 7 May 2021 18:02:13 +0000
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> > Before cc:stable, would you please do one stress test first?
> > It failed in my server, but I didn't dig into it, maybe the fail is meaningless.
> > Just a small suggestion.
>
> Upstream plus these three patches passed an overnight 8-hour stress test
> on four machines here (running a test that's been failing with hung kernels
> and kernel crashes w/o these patches).
>
> What were the symptoms of your failed server?
>
Sorry, I am not sure if the stress test in my server is same with yours.
Usually, I will do one RAS stress test from mce-test/cases/stress before post something.
Maybe this test is not general useful or you have tested it and passed or you may think
the test is not proper though or you tested and you don't think it's one real issue,
then just ignore it please.
Thanks!
Aili Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists