[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad43e2df993e477cbe5d2db44ebbcad5@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 03:28:07 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Aili Yao <yaoaili@...gsoft.com>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@...e.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yaoaili126@...il.com" <yaoaili126@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm,hwpoison: fix sending SIGBUS for Action
Required MCE
> Sorry, I am not sure if the stress test in my server is same with yours.
It's better if you test different things ... that's how we get better coverage.
> Usually, I will do one RAS stress test from mce-test/cases/stress before post something.
> Maybe this test is not general useful or you have tested it and passed or you may think
> the test is not proper though or you tested and you don't think it's one real issue,
> then just ignore it please.
I haven't re-run the mce-test cases for a while. The test that was run on these patches
involves a multi-threaded application running on all logical CPUs. When poison is injected
many of the CPUs can hit the poison close together. So it's a good stress test for the new
series.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists