linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] sched,delayacct: Some cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 May 2021 09:08:57 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com, bsingharora@...il.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        maz@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        riel@...riel.com, hannes@...xchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] sched,delayacct: Some cleanups


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Due to:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000001d43ac05c0f5c6a0@google.com
> 
> and general principle, delayacct really shouldn't be using ktime (pvclock also
> really shouldn't be doing what it does, but that's another story). This lead me
> to looking at the SCHED_INFO, SCHEDSTATS, DELAYACCT (and PSI) accounting hell.
> 
> The rest of the patches are an attempt at simplifying all that a little. All
> that crud is enabled by default for distros which is leading to a death by a
> thousand cuts.
> 
> The last patch is an attempt at default disabling DELAYACCT, because I don't
> think anybody actually uses that much, but what do I know, there were no ill
> effects on my testbox. Perhaps we should mirror
> /proc/sys/kernel/sched_schedstats and provide a delayacct sysctl for runtime
> frobbing.

Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

(This includes the #6 RFC patch.)

Thanks,

	Ingo