[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3bad54b9-599a-91c6-48b8-dd1c494f61b5@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 09:03:13 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for
apple,pinctrl
On 08/05/2021 10:19, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The Apple GPIO controller is a simple combined pin and GPIO conroller
> present on Apple ARM SoC platforms, including various iPhone and iPad
> devices and the "Apple Silicon" Macs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/apple.h | 13 +++
> 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/apple.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cc7805ca6ba1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Apple GPIO controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>
> +
> +description: |
> + The Apple GPIO controller is a simple combined pin and GPIO conroller
> + present on Apple ARM SoC platforms, including various iPhone and iPad
> + devices and the "Apple Silicon" Macs.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: apple,t8103-pinctrl
> + - const: apple,pinctrl
What is the point of having very generic final compatible in the binding
which does not relate to actual hardware?
Let's say next SoC will be
apple,x-abcd-foo-2323-whatever-nothing-in-common and you still have to
use generic "apple,pinctrl" even though HW is not at all compatible?
This looks like wildcard, not HW description.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists