[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d332f69c-33a1-b1c9-e1c9-3c8d756594ef@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 09:09:00 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>, kettenis@...nbsd.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
sven@...npeter.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for
apple,pinctrl
On 09/05/2021 05:50, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>>> So is this an entirely Apple thing now, and not based on some Samsung
>>>> block from S3C like what we have seen before?
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell, yes. This Apple controller has a single
>>> register per pin that controls the muxing and gpio functions, whereas
>>> the S3C controller seems to have 4 registers per pin.
>>
>> Fair enough.
>>
>
> Right, doesn't sound like any Samsung pin controller I'm familiar
> with, although I haven't followed new hardware developments since I
> left Samsung a few years ago. I've stayed as a maintainer mostly to
> help with the legacy SoCs I had worked with, e.g. s3c6410. :)
I can confirm that it looks different than Samsung designs.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists