[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202105101524.3B76F77AB@keescook>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:24:43 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Saripalli, RK" <rsaripal@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, bsd@...hat.com,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] x86/cpufeatures: Implement Predictive Store
Forwarding control.
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:15:32AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, May 10 2021 at 15:09, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:44:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Kees, any opinions?
> >
> > I agree: if PSF is a subset of SSBD, there's no need for the additional
> > machinery.
> >
> > On a related topic, what happened to Andi's patch to switch the seccomp
> > defaults? I can't find it now...
>
> You mean this one:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200312231222.81861-1-andi@firstfloor.org
>
> If so, then it has lacks a follow up.
I swear there was a follow-up to this. I will try to find it again.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists