[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210510092751.GA36522@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 10:27:51 +0100
From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Ryan Y <xuewyan@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: Keep UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED flag in sync when
calculating last_enqueued_diff
> > >
> > > static inline unsigned long task_util_est(struct task_struct *p)
> > > @@ -4002,7 +4002,7 @@ static inline void util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> > > * Reset EWMA on utilization increases, the moving average is used only
> > > * to smooth utilization decreases.
> > > */
> >
> > Needs to be updated to add:
> >
> > last_enqueued_diff = ue.enqueued & ~UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED;
>
> The flag had been cleared before, otherwise would return earlier, so
> there is no need to clear this flag again.
Indeed, my bad. All good then.
--
Vincent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists