[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqQe5aYqF6iNppY66EfkVNPce_sRF6NJgSn26Rs=_=jxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 11:44:10 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Cc: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: core: Implement support for cache ctrl for SD cards
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 09:40, Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com> wrote:
>
> > In the SD spec v6.x the SD function extension registers for performance
> > enhancements were introduced. As a part of this an optional internal cache
> > on
> > the SD card can be used to improve performance.
> Just to verify that you are aware of that:
> In addition to the extension Registers that were defined in the physical core spec,
> there was a separate document that was released that suggest a common OS API's to those registers.
> It is called "SD specification part A5, SD Extensions API specification".
Thanks for the pointer!
I did have a very brief look at this. The conclusion I made is that
this is way over designed to enable support for features like cache
and poweroff notification. However, there may be other use cases that
could benefit from a user space library, along the lines of the SD
Extensions API, but I can't really tell.
Do you have an interest around this that you can share?
Thanks for reviewing!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists