linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJrAOXEcyUvs/WvY@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 19:34:49 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@....com>
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        Mukul Joshi <mukul.joshi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 08:55:37PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

The condensed patch description in the subject line should start with a
uppercase letter and should be written in imperative tone:

"x86/MCE/AMD: Add a helper function... "

> Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi <mukul.joshi@....com>
> Reviewed-by: John Clements <John.Clements@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>

This is all fine and dandy but it needs your SOB too when you send the
patch.

Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

sections

Sign your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin
When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:

> +bool is_smca_umc_v2(int bank)
> +{
> +	return (smca_get_bank_type(bank) == SMCA_UMC_V2);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_smca_umc_v2);

This addition looks useless when it doesn't have any users.

Also, I'm pretty sceptical this even makes sense to have it exported -
I'm guessing this is for mce_amd.c but I can't say without seeing it in
use.

The same remarks hold true for your patch 3.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette