linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB5263B138C38827A692411634EE529@DM4PR12MB5263.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 01:40:54 +0000
From:   "Joshi, Mukul" <Mukul.Joshi@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna" <NaveenKrishna.Chatradhi@....com>
CC:     "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

Hi Boris,

Thanks for the review comments.
I will update the Subject line and send out an updated patch.

In the meantime, here is the link to where the changes in Patch 2 and 3 are being used:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/2021-May/063423.html

Thanks.

Regards,
Mukul

-----Original Message-----
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 1:35 PM
To: Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna <NaveenKrishna.Chatradhi@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; mingo@...hat.com; mchehab@...nel.org; Joshi, Mukul <Mukul.Joshi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

[CAUTION: External Email]

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 08:55:37PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/MCE/AMD: Helper function to check UMC v2

The condensed patch description in the subject line should start with a uppercase letter and should be written in imperative tone:

"x86/MCE/AMD: Add a helper function... "

> Signed-off-by: Mukul Joshi <mukul.joshi@....com>
> Reviewed-by: John Clements <John.Clements@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>

This is all fine and dandy but it needs your SOB too when you send the patch.

Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

sections

Sign your work - the Developer's Certificate of Origin When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-developed-by:

> +bool is_smca_umc_v2(int bank)
> +{
> +     return (smca_get_bank_type(bank) == SMCA_UMC_V2); } 
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_smca_umc_v2);

This addition looks useless when it doesn't have any users.

Also, I'm pretty sceptical this even makes sense to have it exported - I'm guessing this is for mce_amd.c but I can't say without seeing it in use.

The same remarks hold true for your patch 3.

Thx.

--
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpeople.kernel.org%2Ftglx%2Fnotes-about-netiquette&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cmukul.joshi%40amd.com%7C0a7f1e0a3bf04c9ed89408d914a3141c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637563512928580623%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=z3xbuS8yX4Ea1kG9tWv0tGNQRPZP9N6QcBI2VNjn6W0%3D&amp;reserved=0