linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the staging.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 11:43:42 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tomasz Duszynski <tomasz.duszynski@...akon.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the staging.current
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c

between commit:

  901f84de0e16 ("iio: core: fix ioctl handlers removal")

from the staging.current tree and commit:

  919a6adf8107 ("iio: core: move @chrdev from struct iio_dev to struct iio_dev_opaque")

from the iio tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
index 59efb36db2c7,efb4cf91c9e4..000000000000
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
@@@ -1785,10 -1811,10 +1810,10 @@@ static long iio_ioctl(struct file *filp
  	}
  
  	if (ret == IIO_IOCTL_UNHANDLED)
 -		ret = -EINVAL;
 +		ret = -ENODEV;
  
  out_unlock:
- 	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock);
+ 	mutex_unlock(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock);
  
  	return ret;
  }
@@@ -1925,9 -1951,12 +1950,9 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__iio_device_register)
   **/
  void iio_device_unregister(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
  {
- 	cdev_device_del(&indio_dev->chrdev, &indio_dev->dev);
 -	struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
 -	struct iio_ioctl_handler *h, *t;
 -
+ 	cdev_device_del(&iio_dev_opaque->chrdev, &indio_dev->dev);
  
- 	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock);
+ 	mutex_lock(&iio_dev_opaque->info_exist_lock);
  
  	iio_device_unregister_debugfs(indio_dev);
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped