lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210511174302.GA1291834@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 14:43:02 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     yishaih@...dia.com, dledford@...hat.com,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/mlx4: Remove unnessesary check in
 mlx4_ib_modify_wq()

On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 06:22:41PM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> cur_state and new_state are enums and when GCC considers
> them as unsigned, the conditions are never met.

But doesn't gcc consider enums to be 'int' as the standard requires?

This change looks really sketchy to me, cur_state and new_state are
both userspace controlled data. We should not make assumptions about
the underlying signedness of an enum when validating user data.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ