lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 22:04:41 +0200
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Luo Longjun <luolongjun@...wei.com>
Cc:     will@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sangyan@...wei.com,
        ningyu9@...wei.com, luchunhua@...wei.com,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: configs: remove redundant CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP

Hi Catalin,

Thanks for cc'ing me.

On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>>
>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>>
>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
>>  CONFIG_SPMI=y
>>  CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
>>  CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
> 
> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
> 
> You could add:
> 
> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
> 

I sent the same patch some time ago [1].

I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,

Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>

Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?

Thanks,
  Enric


[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210423075201.2616023-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/T/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ