[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa3d0bf1-8330-42e0-d11b-c554194c3b81@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 09:42:17 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Luo Longjun <luolongjun@...wei.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sangyan@...wei.com,
ningyu9@...wei.com, luchunhua@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: configs: remove redundant CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP
Hi all,
On 11/05/2021 22:04, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
>
> Thanks for cc'ing me.
>
> On 11/5/21 19:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:24:10AM +0800, Luo Longjun wrote:
>>> When I compile kernel in ARM64, it produces the following output:
>>>
>>> *** Default configuration is based on 'defconfig'
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:1018:warning: override: reassigning to
>>> symbol MTK_PMIC_WRAP
>>>
>>> After checking defcofnig, I found two CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP options.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luo Longjun <luolongjun@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> index 08c6f769df9a..9907a431db0d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>>> @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=y
>>> CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>> CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>> CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>>> -CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=m
>>> CONFIG_SPMI=y
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_SINGLE=y
>>> CONFIG_PINCTRL_MAX77620=y
>>
>> Adding Matthias and Enric. This change looks fine to me but I think it
>> should go in via the arm-soc tree. Commit 9fd5449e061e introduced the =m
>> option while commit fbbe38309d56 introduced the =y variant.
>>
>> You could add:
>>
>> Fixes: fbbe38309d56 ("arm64: defconfig: Allow mt8173-based boards to boot from usb")
>>
>
> I sent the same patch some time ago [1].
>
> I agree, either land this patch or mine. In any case,
>
> Reviewed-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>
> Matthias is this something that should go through your tree?
>
Yes, this should go through my tree. I'll take care of it.
Regards,
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists