linux-kernel - [PATCH -next] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Make symbol 'arch_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 14:46:23 +0800
From:   Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
To:     <mark.rutland@....com>, <maz@...nel.org>,
        <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Make symbol 'arch_timer_rate1' static

The sparse tool complains as follows:

drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c:67:5: warning:
 symbol 'arch_timer_rate1' was not declared. Should it be static?

This symbol is not used outside of arm_arch_timer.c, so marks it static.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index fe1a826..800aaa9 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct arch_timer {
 #define to_arch_timer(e) container_of(e, struct arch_timer, evt)
 
 static u32 arch_timer_rate __ro_after_init;
-u32 arch_timer_rate1 __ro_after_init;
+static u32 arch_timer_rate1 __ro_after_init;
 static int arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI] __ro_after_init;
 
 static const char *arch_timer_ppi_names[ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI] = {
-- 
2.6.2