[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1620715583-107670-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:46:23 +0800
From: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
To: <mark.rutland@....com>, <maz@...nel.org>,
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Make symbol 'arch_timer_rate1' static
The sparse tool complains as follows:
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c:67:5: warning:
symbol 'arch_timer_rate1' was not declared. Should it be static?
This symbol is not used outside of arm_arch_timer.c, so marks it static.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index fe1a826..800aaa9 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct arch_timer {
#define to_arch_timer(e) container_of(e, struct arch_timer, evt)
static u32 arch_timer_rate __ro_after_init;
-u32 arch_timer_rate1 __ro_after_init;
+static u32 arch_timer_rate1 __ro_after_init;
static int arch_timer_ppi[ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI] __ro_after_init;
static const char *arch_timer_ppi_names[ARCH_TIMER_MAX_TIMER_PPI] = {
--
2.6.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists