[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABRcYmK+iEMy-DOp2tyaAVGfQMwhyeZGGs-LyO_RYfFprbs34A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 10:09:32 +0200
From: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzbot+63122d0bc347f18c1884@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 3:58 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c:718:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bpf_bprintf_buf'; did you mean 'bpf_bprintf_bufs'?
Ugh, reminder to self: don't zealously rename variables just before
sending a patch out.
I'm sending a v2, sorry for the noise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists