[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210511081054.2125874-1-revest@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 10:10:54 +0200
From: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...nel.org, jackmanb@...gle.com, sdf@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
syzbot+63122d0bc347f18c1884@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Fix nested bpf_bprintf_prepare with more per-cpu buffers
The bpf_seq_printf, bpf_trace_printk and bpf_snprintf helpers share one
per-cpu buffer that they use to store temporary data (arguments to
bprintf). They "get" that buffer with try_get_fmt_tmp_buf and "put" it
by the end of their scope with bpf_bprintf_cleanup.
If one of these helpers gets called within the scope of one of these
helpers, for example: a first bpf program gets called, uses
bpf_trace_printk which calls raw_spin_lock_irqsave which is traced by
another bpf program that calls bpf_snprintf, then the second "get"
fails. Essentially, these helpers are not re-entrant. They would return
-EBUSY and print a warning message once.
This patch triples the number of bprintf buffers to allow three levels
of nesting. This is very similar to what was done for tracepoints in
"9594dc3c7e7 bpf: fix nested bpf tracepoints with per-cpu data"
Fixes: d9c9e4db186a ("bpf: Factorize bpf_trace_printk and bpf_seq_printf")
Reported-by: syzbot+63122d0bc347f18c1884@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 544773970dbc..ef658a9ea5c9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -696,34 +696,35 @@ static int bpf_trace_copy_string(char *buf, void *unsafe_ptr, char fmt_ptype,
*/
#define MAX_PRINTF_BUF_LEN 512
-struct bpf_printf_buf {
- char tmp_buf[MAX_PRINTF_BUF_LEN];
+/* Support executing three nested bprintf helper calls on a given CPU */
+struct bpf_bprintf_buffers {
+ char tmp_bufs[3][MAX_PRINTF_BUF_LEN];
};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_printf_buf, bpf_printf_buf);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_printf_buf_used);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_bprintf_buffers, bpf_bprintf_bufs);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
static int try_get_fmt_tmp_buf(char **tmp_buf)
{
- struct bpf_printf_buf *bufs;
- int used;
+ struct bpf_bprintf_buffers *bufs;
+ int nest_level;
preempt_disable();
- used = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_printf_buf_used);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(used > 1)) {
- this_cpu_dec(bpf_printf_buf_used);
+ nest_level = this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nest_level > ARRAY_SIZE(bufs->tmp_bufs))) {
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
preempt_enable();
return -EBUSY;
}
- bufs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_printf_buf);
- *tmp_buf = bufs->tmp_buf;
+ bufs = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_bprintf_bufs);
+ *tmp_buf = bufs->tmp_bufs[nest_level - 1];
return 0;
}
void bpf_bprintf_cleanup(void)
{
- if (this_cpu_read(bpf_printf_buf_used)) {
- this_cpu_dec(bpf_printf_buf_used);
+ if (this_cpu_read(bpf_bprintf_nest_level)) {
+ this_cpu_dec(bpf_bprintf_nest_level);
preempt_enable();
}
}
--
2.31.1.607.g51e8a6a459-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists